news 
Mars’ Small Mass Still Puzzles Planetary Scientists
The Red Planet’s Enigmatic Mass
As the solar system took shape, roughly 4.6 billion years ago, a series of complex and intricate processes unfolded. The formation of our planets is now well understood in broad terms. However, there remain some enigmas that continue to perplex planetary scientists. Mars’ small mass is one such conundrum.
The Red Planet’s diminutive size is quite an anomaly. In fact, the vast majority of solar systems are thought to host a Venus-like planet similar in mass and size to our own Earth. But Mars? That’s a different story altogether. Its minuscule dimensions make it stand out as a curious exception within our celestial neighborhood.
The Grand Tack Model suggests that an early migration of Jupiter towards the Sun, followed by its subsequent outward movement, played a significant role in Mars’ small size. During this tumultuous period, Jupiter disrupted the planetary building blocks necessary for the formation of a larger Mars. Without Jupiter’s intervention, it is possible that Mars would have evolved into a planet roughly the size of Venus or even larger.
Another theory posits that the Main Asteroid Belt never offered sufficient material for the Red Planet to grow in mass. In this scenario, the solar system’s early history was characterized by an extreme lack of building blocks. This led to the formation of Mars as we know it today – a planet with a mere 10% of Earth’s mass.
A third perspective emphasizes the chaotic nature of the early inner solar system. Here, the conditions were so tumultuous that rocky planets beyond the orbits of Venus and Earth could not coalesce into anything larger than the present-day Mars.
So, what does this all mean? The importance of resolving this enigma lies in our ability to better comprehend the mysteries surrounding the formation of our own solar system. By gaining a deeper understanding of these processes, planetary scientists hope to identify patterns that can be applied to other star systems.
Source: http://www.forbes.com
