
The Rise of the PhD Founder in ClimateTech
In recent years, we’ve seen a surge in scientists and researchers abandoning academia to start companies focused on addressing climate change. While it’s not entirely new for academics to pivot into entrepreneurship, the scale and scope of these efforts are unprecedented. I’d argue that this shift represents a critical moment of change.
It’s no secret that the climate crisis is accelerating at an alarming rate. In response, investors have begun to take notice of climatetech startups with bold ideas and tangible solutions. Scientists-turned-entrepreneurs are raising serious capital, and it’s not just venture capitalists – they’re also attracting strategic partners and even governments.
To illustrate this trend, let me highlight a few standouts that have raised significant funding in recent years:
* Twelve: Co-founded by Dr. Etosha Cave, Twelve has developed technology to transform CO₂ into valuable products like fuels and chemicals. In September of last year, the company raised $645 million for its e-fuels plant.
* Heirloom: Founded by Dr. Noah McQueen, Heirloom is focusing on direct air capture using naturally occurring minerals. The startup secured a whopping $150 million in Series B funding to advance its technology.
* Form Energy: Co-founded by Dr. Yet-Ming Chiang, Form Energy is pioneering innovative energy storage solutions for a fully renewable electric grid. They’ve raised an astonishing $1.2 billion to date, including a $405 million Series F round in October.
* Sublime Systems: Founded by Dr. Leah Ellis, Sublime Systems is pushing the boundaries of low-carbon cement production. The startup recently secured a significant $75 million investment to scale its manufacturing.
Now, here’s where things get interesting – or, dare I say, revolutionary. Climatetech startups require massive amounts of capital to reach commercialization, often requiring hundreds of millions or even billions of dollars. This contrasts starkly with software startups, which can gain traction and secure funding in the tens or even low hundreds of thousands.
As a result, investors need to adopt a different mindset when it comes to climatetech. They must be willing to take big swings, understanding that these companies require years, if not decades, to develop. This shift towards climate-focused entrepreneurship is critical because academia and policy have failed to make meaningful progress in the fight against climate change.
Academia, by its very nature, is slow-moving and often incentivized to prioritize publishing over innovation. Meanwhile, policymakers are gridlocked on effective solutions due to partisan politics or lack of vision.
But startups – particularly those founded by scientists with a deep understanding of the technical challenges at hand – offer an alternative path forward. They can create tangible products that make a difference while fostering an ecosystem of collaboration and innovation.
Source: http://www.forbes.com