news 
The proposal to replace the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) with RISC-V has sparked a heated debate within the cryptocurrency community. While some experts argue that such a move could lead to faster and more scalable transactions, others warn of the risks involved in overhauling the foundation of the Ethereum ecosystem.
One of the most significant advantages touted by proponents is the potential for significantly faster zk-rollup proofs. This, they claim, could be a game-changer for scaling the network’s capabilities. By leveraging RISC-V’s open-source and customizable architecture, developers might create more sophisticated smart contracts that can take advantage of parallel execution and zero-knowledge applications.
However, many experts have expressed concerns about the sheer scale of the migration process. They argue that rewriting all existing smart contracts from scratch would be a monumental task, requiring years of development and testing. Moreover, this drastic change would also necessitate re-auditing each contract to ensure its security and integrity are maintained.
Furthermore, Ethereum’s L2s (Layer 2) would require significant changes as well. In the event that the EVM is replaced with RISC-V, it may become incompatible with existing infrastructure, resulting in a complete reboot of the ecosystem. This could potentially break composability within the network and even force L2s to operate independently, fragmenting the community.
The question remains: would replacing the EVM lead to a scalable future or is this proposal simply too risk-laden?
Source: cryptopotato.com
