news 
President Trump has issued a clarification regarding staffing decisions within federal agencies, effectively limiting the authority of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to enforce workforce reductions. The move is seen as an attempt to address growing discontent among Cabinet members and government employees over DOGE’s ambitious plans for restructuring the federal workforce.
As part of the overhaul, Trump instructed Cabinet secretaries to take full responsibility for staffing decisions within their respective departments. This change in approach aims to ensure that department heads have a greater say in determining which personnel remain employed by the government.
Trump emphasized the importance of retaining talented and productive employees while acknowledging the need for reductions to eliminate inefficiencies. The President’s stance suggests that any future cuts will be more targeted, rather than broad-based, as previously directed by DOGE.
Musk’s role in enforcing workforce reductions has not been entirely diminished, however. Trump clarified that if department heads are unable or unwilling to make necessary cuts, Musk would step in to ensure compliance with the administration’s goals for a leaner government.
The development is expected to quell concerns among Cabinet members and government employees who felt sidelined by DOGE’s top-down approach. Critics have accused Musk of overstepping his authority and disregarding the expertise of department heads in favor of his own vision for government restructuring.
Trump’s clarification has also been met with mixed reactions from various stakeholders. Some have praised the move as a necessary step to restore balance between the executive branch and Cabinet agencies, while others have expressed concern that Musk’s influence remains significant despite the restrictions.
Despite controversy surrounding DOGE’s claims of having saved $105 billion, critics continue to question the validity of such figures. Furthermore, the agency has faced criticism for its rapid pace of personnel cuts, which some argue lacks transparency and oversight.
As DOGE continues its efforts to restructure the federal workforce, these developments may signal a shift in approach aimed at addressing concerns from various stakeholders.
